Hughes v. The State of Illinois System of Employment Under S. OLR et al
Sidney E Hughes |
The City of Chicago, Illinois State Police and The State of Illinois System of Employment Under S. OLR |
1:2020cv05529 |
September 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated. (dm, ) |
Filing 9 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 10/30/2020. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER : For the reasons stated in the Order, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted #4 . Upon initial review, the complaint #1 has been dismissed with prejudice as duplicative. Plaintiff's application for attorney representation #5 is dismissed as moot. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on October 30, 2020. (For further detail see attached order.) Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Sidney E Hughes for attorney representation (nsf, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Sidney E Hughes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (nsf, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Sidney E Hughes (nsf, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Sidney E Hughes. (Exhibits) (nsf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.