Smith v. Saul
| Stacy A. Smith |
| Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2020cv05561 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| M David Weisman |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file electronic certified administrative record and answer to plaintiff's complaint #11 is moot. Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file electronic certified administrative record and answer to plaintiff's complaint #12 is granted up to and included to 1/19/2021. Mailed notice (ao,)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Lindland, Kurt)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Lindland, Kurt)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Weisman. Parties are directed to follow the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Mailed notice (ao,)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable M. David Weisman for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable Virginia M. Kendall no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/14/20.(gcy, )
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 7
DESIGNATION of Kurt N. Lindland as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Lindland, Kurt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/29/2020. Plaintiff Smith's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. See Order for further details. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing and remanding the decision subject to review is due 60 days after administrative record is filed. The Commissioner's motion to affirm the decision and brief in support thereof are due 45 days after Plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after the Commissioner's brief is filed. Parties are encouraged to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge in order receive expeditious ruling on the matter due to the significant caseload of the District Court. Parties are to meet and confer by 10/13/2020 whether they jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/28/2020: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (lk, ).
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, )
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Stacy A. Smith for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Stacy A. Smith by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Stacy A. Smith ; (Attachments: #1 ALJ decision)(Schultz, Barry)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Kurt N. Lindland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacy A. Smith | |
| Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
