Hall v. Brookhart et al
| Rapheal Hall |
| Dee Dee Brookhart and Deanna Brookhart |
| 1:2020cv05627 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is given until 11/3/20 to either to file an in forma pauperis application on the enclosed form with the information required by 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(2) or to pay the $5.00 filing fee. If Petitioner does not comply, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice. Petitioner's motion for attorney representation, #4 is denied without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to update the docket to reflect that Respondent is Dr. Deanna Brookhart, Warden, Lawrence Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/29/2020: Mailed notice (rc, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Petitioner Rapheal Hall for attorney representation. (rc, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Rapheal Hall for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (rc, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (rc, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Rapheal Hall against Dee Dee Brookhart. (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
