Shifrin et al v. John Does 1-78
| Dr. K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLC, Dr. David Shifrin and Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute LLC |
| John Does 1-78 |
| 1:2020cv05932 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM text entry,,, #3 by Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute LLC, David Shifrin, K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLC Court Ordered Memorandum Regarding Jurisdiction In Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited, Expedited Discovery and For Preservation of Electronic Evidence (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Lexis Cited Authority)(Mudd, Charles) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute LLC, David Shifrin, K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLC by Charles Lee Mudd, Lee (Mudd, Charles) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery #2 is entered and continued. The court has an independent obligation to make sure it has jurisdiction over the case and it has some doubts. Plaintiffs shall file a memorandum explaining how they have Article III standing to pursue a claim under 18 U.S.C. 1030, when it does not appear that their claim falls within the scope of injuries Congress sought to remedy in that statute. In addition to explaining their Article III standing to pursue a 1030 claim, plaintiffs must also explain whether they state a claim for relief under 1030 when their computer systems were not the ones defendants allegedly accessed without authority. Plaintiffs' memorandum is due by 11/30/20. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION by Plaintiffs Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute LLC, David Shifrin, K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLC to expedite limited discovery, MOTION by Plaintiffs Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute LLC, David Shifrin, K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLCLeave to Conduct Expedited Discovery and for Preservation of Electronic Evidence (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Charles Lee Mudd Jr., #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Lexis Cited Case Law)(Deurance, Graham) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ke, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by The D.A.S. Group, LLC, David Shifrin, The Shifrin Group, LLC, K. Sheila Shifrin, Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17511209. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Deurance, Graham) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
