Adebowale v. City of Chicago et al
| Adeoye O. Adebowale |
| Detective Jorge (George) Gonzales, Officer Avis Jamison, Officer J. Howard, Sergeant Jeffrey E. Hughes, Detective Dwayne C. Davis, City of Chicago, Cook County, Does 1-50 Inclusive, Officer Vermillion, As Yet Unknown Supervisors of Defendants' Officers, Rajeev K. Bajaj and Ana Craberra |
| 1:2020cv06054 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adeoye O. Adebowale as to Rajeev K. Bajaj on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020; City of Chicago on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020; Cook County on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Status hearing held on 12/3/20. Plaintiff was not present by telephone. Plaintiff is given one final chance to file an amended complaint by 12/11/20. If he fails to do so, the Court will assume that he no longer wishes to pursue the case, and the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Counsel should provide a copy of this order to the Plaintiff. Status hearing set for 12/16/20 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 16 STATUS Report Joint, on behalf of Defendant City, Defendant Bajaj, and Plaintiff Adebowale, by City of Chicago (Sotomayor, Stephanie) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendant Rajeev Bajaj's motion for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise plead #13 is stricken for failure to comply with the Court's standing order requiring counsel to confer and indicate whether a motion is opposed or not.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rajeev K. Bajaj by Jessica L. Watkins (Watkins, Jessica) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Rajeev K. Bajaj for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead (Henderson, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rajeev K. Bajaj by Matthew R. Henderson (Henderson, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Stephanie Amanda Sotomayor of Change of Address (Attachments: #1 Active Cases)(Sotomayor, Stephanie) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Raoul Vertick Mowatt (Mowatt, Raoul) |
| ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant Ana Craberra. (kl, ) |
| ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant Cook County. (kl, ) |
| Filing 9 LIST OF EXHIBITS A-E Referred to in Complaint and Further and Better in by Plaintiff Adeoye O. Adebowale Particulars of Factual Allegations/Claims. (Attachments).(nsf, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Stephanie Amanda Sotomayor (Sotomayor, Stephanie) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Detective Jorge (George) Gonzales, Ana Craberra, Sergeant Jeffrey E. Hughes, Officer Avis Jamison (daj, ) |
| ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant City of Chicago. (daj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Rajeev K. Bajaj, Cook County (jn, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City of Chicago, Detective Dwayne C. Davis, Officer J. Howard, Officer Vermillion (pj, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), a Plaintiff may file an amended complaint once as a matter of course before a responsive pleading is served. However, "an amended complaint supersedes an original complaint and renders the original complaint void." Flannery v. Recording Indus. Ass'n of Am., 354 F.3d 632, 638 n.1 (7th Cir. 2004). Thus, an amended complaint must stand complete on its own, and all allegations against all Defendants must be set forth in the amended complaint without reference to the original complaint. The Plaintiff's amended complaint improperly attempts to "repeat[] and reallege[] paragraphs 1-70 contained in his [original] Complaint... as if fully set forth herein." Thus, the Court strikes without prejudice the Plaintiff's amended complaint #5 . Plaintiff may refile his amended complaint consistent with Rule 15 and this minute entry. Telephone Conference set for 12/3/2020 at 9:00 a.m. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. The Court orders the parties to file a joint written status report by 11/30/20. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED complaint by Adeoye O. Adebowale against Detective Jorge (George) Gonzales, As Yet Unknown Supervisors of Defendants' Officers, Rajeev K. Bajaj, City of Chicago, Cook County, Ana Craberra, Detective Dwayne C. Davis, Does 1-50 Inclusive, Officer J. Howard, Sergeant Jeffrey E. Hughes, Officer Avis Jamison, Officer Vermillion (pj, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Adeoye O. Adebowale (axc, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (axc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adeoye O. Adebowale; Jury Demand. (axc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
