Perez v. RUF US, Inc. et al
| Sergio Perez |
| RUF US, INC. d/b/a RUF Briquetting Systems, RUF Maschinenbau GMBH & Co., RUF Trading GMBH & Co. KG, RUF US, Inc. an Ohio corporation doing business as RUF Briquetting Systems and RUF GMBH & CO. KG |
| 1:2020cv06158 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 SECOND AMENDED complaint by Sergio Perez against RUF Maschinenbau GMBH & Co., RUF US, Inc., RUF Trading GMBH & Co. KG (LaCien, Brian) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Plaintiff's motion for leave to file second amended complaint #15 is granted. Plaintiff is directed to file the second amended complaint as a separate document on the docket. (rao, ) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Plaintiff Sergio Perez to file instanter Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 - 2nd Amended Complaint)(LaCien, Brian) |
| Filing 14 HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 11/16/2020:(rao, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Agreed motion for entry of HIPAA Protective Order #12 is granted. (rao, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant RUF US, Inc. for protective order Agreed Motion for Entry of Qualified Protective Order Pursuant to HIPAA (Leamy, Richard) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sergio Perez by Brian LaCien (LaCien, Brian) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The Stipulation for extension of time for Defendant Ruf US, Inc.'s responsive pleading #9 is granted. Defendant Ruf US, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 12/21/2020 or 21 days after the filing of any amended complaint. The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 1/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION For Extension of time for Defendant RUF US, Inc.'s Responsive Pleading (Leamy, Richard) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by RUF US, Inc. re notice of removal #1 (Leamy, Richard) |
| Filing 7 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (bg, ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Richard John Leamy, Jr on behalf of RUF US, INC. d/b/a RUF Briquetting Systems regarding attorney appearance #4 , attorney appearance #3 , attorney appearance #5 , notice of removal #1 , civil cover sheet #2 (Leamy, Richard) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant RUF US, INC. d/b/a RUF Briquetting Systems by Lindsay C. Omolecki (Omolecki, Lindsay) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant RUF US, INC. d/b/a RUF Briquetting Systems by Rachel S. Nevarez (Nevarez, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant RUF US, INC. d/b/a RUF Briquetting Systems by Richard John Leamy, Jr (Leamy, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Leamy, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, case number (2020 L 009179) filed by RUF US, INC. d/b/a RUF Briquetting Systems Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17547300. (Leamy, Richard) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (exr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
