Patel et al v. MS International, Inc.
| Pramod Patel and Ankit Shah |
| MS International, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv06234 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STATUS Report (Joint) by Pramod Patel, Ankit Shah (Chapin, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Appellee shall file a response to Appellant's motion #7 by 12/31/20, and Appellant shall file any reply by 1/8/21. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Appellee MS International, Inc. by James Kenneth Borcia (Borcia, James)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE by Pramod Patel, Ankit Shah re MOTION by Appellants Pramod Patel, Ankit Shah for Certification to 7th Circuit Court of Appeals #7 (Chapin, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Appellants Pramod Patel, Ankit Shah for Certification to 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Memorandum Opinion)(Chapin, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 6
SUPPLEMENT to bankruptcy appeal #1 Appellant Designation of Record (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter, #2 Exhibit)(USBC-Rivera, )
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Appellants Pramod Patel, Ankit Shah by Aaron B. Chapin Appearance of Alexander Terras (Chapin, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Appellants Pramod Patel, Ankit Shah by Aaron B. Chapin (Chapin, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 3
MAILED Rule 83.16 and Bankruptcy Rule 8010(3) letters to all counsel of record. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Rule 8010(3) letter)(jh, )
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 12/14/2020, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 1
APPEAL from U.S. Bankruptcy Court case number 19 A 740 (Judge Cox) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Transmittal Letter, #3 Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(USBC-Rivera, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lxk, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
