Emoji Company GmbH v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Plaintiff: Emoji Company GmbH
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, DERAYEE, DIYASY, Boshuo and DECORA
Case Number: 1:2020cv06303
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John F Kness
Referring Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2020 Filing 38 MOTION by Defendants DECORA, DERAYEE, DIYASY to withdraw response in opposition to motion #35 for entry of a preliminary injunction (Ju, Tianyu)
December 22, 2020 Filing 37 MEMORANDUM by Boshuo in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #36 and improper service and opposition to Plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction (Ju, Tianyu)
December 21, 2020 Filing 36 MOTION by Defendant Boshuo to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and improper service (Ju, Tianyu)
December 21, 2020 Filing 35 RESPONSE by Boshuo, DECORA, DERAYEE, DIYASY in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction #24 (Ju, Tianyu)
December 18, 2020 Filing 34 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Boshuo, DECORA, DERAYEE, DIYASY by Andrew Jonathan Palmer Palmer, Andrew (Palmer, Andrew)
December 18, 2020 Filing 33 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants DECORA, DERAYEE, DIYASY by Tianyu Ju (Ju, Tianyu)
December 17, 2020 Filing 32 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants DERAYEE, DIYASY, DECORA by Tao Liu Liu, Tao (Liu, Tao)
December 16, 2020 Filing 31 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Boshuo by Tianyu Ju (Ju, Tianyu)
December 15, 2020 Filing 30 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Boshuo by He Cheng (Cheng, He)
December 15, 2020 Filing 29 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Boshuo by Tao Liu Liu, Tao (Liu, Tao)
December 15, 2020 Filing 28 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Emoji Company GmbH as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 12/15/2020, answer due 1/5/2021. (Hierl, Michael)
December 14, 2020 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto (txl, )
December 9, 2020 Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion #24 for entry of a preliminary injunction. Although the memorandum of law #25 Plaintiff has submitted in support of its current motion refers to the electronic service of process the Court authorized previously #18 #19 , neither the memorandum nor the Declaration submitted by Plaintiff #26 establish that the authorized actions relating to service have in fact been taken. More pertinently, Plaintiff has not filed the proof of service required under Rule 4(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without certification that Plaintiff has provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency either of this action or the motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court is unwilling to grant further preliminary injunctive relief. Accordingly, the motion for entry of a preliminary injunction is entered and continued. If and when Plaintiff provides proof of service, as is commonly done in similar "Schedule A" counterfeiting cases before the filing of a motion seeking a preliminary injunction, the Court will act promptly on Plaintiff's pending motion. Mailed notice (ef, )
December 4, 2020 Filing 26 DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction #24 (Hierl, Michael)
December 4, 2020 Filing 25 MEMORANDUM by Emoji Company GmbH in support of motion for preliminary injunction #24 (Hierl, Michael)
December 4, 2020 Filing 24 MOTION by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction (Hierl, Michael)
November 23, 2020 Filing 23 EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/23/2020. Mailed notice(ef, )
November 23, 2020 Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of the existing temporary restraining order #20 is granted. Enter order. Mailed notice (ef, )
November 20, 2020 Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion #20 for an extension of the existing temporary restraining order. Counsel for Plaintiff is again requested to submit (Cf. 20-cv-05306, Dkt. 24) a proposed order for the Court's consideration at proposed_order_kness@ilnd.uscourts.gov. Any proposed order should heed the requirement of FRCP 65(b)(2) that the reasons for any extension of a TRO be entered in the record. Mailed notice (ef, )
November 18, 2020 Filing 20 MOTION by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order (Hierl, Michael)
November 10, 2020 Filing 19 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/10/2020. Mailed notice(ef, )
November 10, 2020 Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal #5 , motion for leave to exceed the page limitation on briefs #7 , and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, electronic service of process, and other relief #8 are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries #6 and #10 through #14 . In addition, for the purpose of these motions, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by Plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this District have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. A domain name transfer is appropriate to prevent infringing conduct. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice (ef, )
October 26, 2020 Filing 16 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jh, )
October 23, 2020 Filing 17 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable John F. Kness for all further proceedings pursuant to IOP 13(f). Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/23/2020.(jh, )
October 23, 2020 Filing 15 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Emoji Company GmbH (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 14 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Reiter Declaration (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 13 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Reiter Declaration (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 12 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Reiter Declaration (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 11 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Reiter Declaration (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 10 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Reiter Declaration (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by Emoji Company GmbH in support of motion for temporary restraining order, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Santiago Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Declaration Reiter Declaration, #4 Declaration Hierl Declaration, #5 Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3)(Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 6 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH Sealed Schedule A (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH by William Benjamin Kalbac (Kalbac, William)
October 23, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Emoji Company GmbH by Michael A. Hierl (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Emoji Company GmbH; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17573344. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Hierl, Michael)
October 23, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emoji Company GmbH v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emoji Company GmbH
Represented By: Michael A. Hierl
Represented By: William Benjamin Kalbac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DERAYEE
Represented By: Tianyu Ju
Represented By: Andrew Jonathan Palmer
Represented By: Tao Liu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DIYASY
Represented By: Tianyu Ju
Represented By: Andrew Jonathan Palmer
Represented By: Tao Liu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boshuo
Represented By: Tianyu Ju
Represented By: He Cheng
Represented By: Andrew Jonathan Palmer
Represented By: Tao Liu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DECORA
Represented By: Tianyu Ju
Represented By: Andrew Jonathan Palmer
Represented By: Tao Liu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?