Reveles v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
| Raul Reveles |
| Haran and Cook County Dept. of Corrections |
| 1:2020cv06400 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied for lack of a sufficient showing of indigence. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this case, he must pre-pay the $400.00 filing fee by December 18, 2020. Failure to do so will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court defers screening of Plaintiff's complaint #1 pending payment of the filing fee. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/18/2020. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Raul Reveles for attorney representation. (aee, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Raul Reveles for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Raul Reveles (Exhibits). (Envelope not postmarked) (aee, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/30/2020: #1 Envelope) (aee, ). Modified on 10/30/2020 (aee, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
