Holmes v. Salinas et al
Zharvellis Holmes |
City of Waukegan, Dante Salinas, James Keating and Wayne Walles |
1:2020cv06437 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The Court has reviewed the status report. In light of the recent service of process, the status hearing is reset to 2/8/21 at 8:45 a.m. A status report is due by 2/2/21. The dial in number remains the same. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 28 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Zharvellis Holmes. Dante Salinas waiver sent on 12/10/2020, answer due 2/8/2021. (O'Connor, Kevin) |
Filing 27 STATUS Report Joint Initial by Zharvellis Holmes (O'Connor, Kevin) |
Filing 26 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dante Salinas by Raymond John Byrne (Byrne, Raymond) |
Filing 25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dante Salinas by James L. DeAno (DeAno, James) |
Filing 24 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dante Salinas by Laura Lee Scarry (Scarry, Laura) |
Filing 23 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Waukegan, Wayne Walles by Rick Hammond (Hammond, Rick) |
Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wayne Walles by Sarah B Jansen (Jansen, Sarah) |
Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wayne Walles by Stephanie W Weiner (Weiner, Stephanie) |
Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James Keating by Zachary Adam Pestine (Pestine, Zachary) |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James Keating by Brian Patrick Gainer (Gainer, Brian) |
Filing 18 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Zharvellis Holmes. James Keating waiver sent on 12/3/2020, answer due 2/1/2021. (Murray, Ashley) |
Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Waukegan by Sarah B Jansen (Jansen, Sarah) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Waukegan by Stephanie W Weiner (Weiner, Stephanie) |
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Zharvellis Holmes. City of Waukegan waiver sent on 11/2/2020, answer due 1/1/2021. (Murray, Ashley) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Zharvellis Holmes. Wayne Walles waiver sent on 11/2/2020, answer due 1/1/2021. (Murray, Ashley) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 12/16/20 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 12/10/20. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion for protective order #11 is stricken for failure to comply with the Court's standing orders. This Court's standing order regarding motion practice requires a movant to meet and confer prior to filing a motion, and in those instances where the motion is agreed or unopposed, the motion should so indicate. This procedure often will obviate the need for the parties to expend time and resources unnecessarily to appear for an uncontested motion. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes for protective order to Preserve Evidence (Murray, Ashley) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Cameron Joseph Tober Amended (Tober, Cameron) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Ashley Meghan Murray Amended (Murray, Ashley) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Matthew M. Popp Amended (Popp, Matthew) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Kevin William O'Connor Amended (O'Connor, Kevin) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Cameron Joseph Tober (Tober, Cameron) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Matthew M. Popp (Popp, Matthew) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Ashley Meghan Murray (Murray, Ashley) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zharvellis Holmes by Kevin William O'Connor (O'Connor, Kevin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (O'Connor, Kevin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT at Law filed by Zharvellis Holmes; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17592922.(O'Connor, Kevin) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.