Walker v. CT Corporation System et al
Iesha N Walker |
Hilton Chicago/Magnificant Mile Suites and CT Corporation System |
1:2020cv06684 |
November 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS returned unexecuted by U.S. Marshal's Office wrong case number and wrong defendants.(nsf, ) |
SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 11/16/20 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants CT Corporation System, Hilton Chicago/Magnificant Mile Suites. via email. (nsf, ) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Iesha N Walker. (Exhibits) (nsf, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Clerk's Office shall file plaintiff's complaint. The U.S. Marshal Service is appointed to serve Defendants. Parties are directed to submit a joint written status report by 1/18/2021. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Iesha N Walker. (rc, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Iesha N Walker for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (rc, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (rc, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Iesha N Walker. (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.