Lee v. Saul
| Michelle M. Lee |
| Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2020cv06793 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sunil R Harjani |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record #11 is granted. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 3/16/2021. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision is due by 5/17/2021; Defendant's motion to affirm the decision and his brief in support are due by 7/1/2021; and Plaintiff's reply brief is due by 7/15/2021. Mailed notice (lxs, )
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Donohue, Megan)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Harjani for all further proceedings. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 1/15/2021. Defendant shall also submit a courtesy copy of the administrative record to Judge Harjani's chambers (Room 1870). Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision is due by 3/16/2021; Defendant's motion to affirm the decision and his brief in support are due by 4/30/2021; and Plaintiff's reply brief is due by 5/14/2021. The parties must include in their briefs a list of the questions presented in support of remand or affirmance. Stating simply that the ALJ's decision is not supported by substantial evidence is not sufficient. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week prior to the due date. Mailed notice (lxs, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Gary Feinerman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Gary Feinerman on 11/25/2020. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The parties have consented to proceed before Magistrate Judge Harjani #7 . The status hearing set for 1/26/2021 #6 is stricken. This case will be forwarded to Magistrate Judge Harjani for further proceedings. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
|
Filing 7
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. Initial status hearing set for 1/26/2021 at 9:00 a.m. By 1/19/2021, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether they agree to a remand and whether they consent to reassignment for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge. With respect to scheduling, the parties shall comply with Local Rule 16.4. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
|
Filing 5
DESIGNATION of Megan Elizabeth Donohue as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Donohue, Megan)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michelle M. Lee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michelle M. Lee by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Michelle M. Lee; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
| Represented By: | Megan Elizabeth Donohue |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle M. Lee | |
| Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
