RAMIREZ-LEDESMA v. Wolf et al
| HERMELINDA RAMIREZ-LEDESMA |
| District Director Thomas Cioppa, Director FBI Christopher A. Wray and Acting Secretary Chad Wolf |
| 1:2020cv06820 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 1/19/21, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (ke, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (exr, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HERMELINDA RAMIREZ-LEDESMA by Reem H Odeh (Odeh, Reem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by HERMELINDA RAMIREZ-LEDESMA ; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17656732. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Odeh, Reem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
