Careaga Beltran v. V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. et al
| Pedro Careaga Beltran |
| V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. and Atlas Employment Services, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv06870 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 29 U.S.C. § 185 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint #13 is granted. The court sets the following agreed briefing schedule for defendants' motions to dismiss: motions to dismiss or other responsive pleadings due on or before 1/22/2021; plaintiff's responses due by 2/22/2021; defendants' replies due by 3/15/2021. Telephonic status hearing set for 5/17/2021 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (888) 684-8852 and the access code is 1503395. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Atlas Employment Services, Inc. for extension of time Defendants' Unopposed Motion Requesting An Extension Of Time For Their Responsive Pleadings To Plaintiff's Complaint (Kellam, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendants V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. and Atlas Employment Service, Inc.'s unopposed motion for an enlargement of time within which to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint and to set agreed briefing schedule on motions to dismiss #10 is granted. Defendants' motion to dismiss due on or before 12/21/2020; plaintiff's response due 1/26/2021; defendants' reply due 2/15/2021. The court will issue a ruling via CM/ECF. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pedro Careaga Beltran by Scott Anthony Morgan (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Morgan, Scott) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendants Atlas Employment Services, Inc., V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. for extension of time DEFENDANT V&V SUPREMO FOODS, INC. AND ATLAS EMPLOYMENT SERVICE, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND TO SET AGREED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Selvey, Jason) |
| Filing 9 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pedro Careaga Beltran by John Sawin (Sawin, John) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Atlas Employment Services, Inc. by James J. Convery (Convery, James) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Atlas Employment Services, Inc. by Matthew Patrick Kellam (Kellam, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. by Katherine H. Oblak (Oblak, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. by Jody Kahn Mason (Mason, Jody) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. by Jason A. Selvey (Selvey, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Selvey, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, case number (2020CH06193) filed by V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17664735. (Selvey, Jason) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ke, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.