Bryant v. Saul
Dustin Bryant |
Andrew Marshall Saul |
1:2020cv06900 |
November 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Maria Valdez |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: Defendant's Unopposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record #11 is granted. The time for filing the administrative record and answer is extended to 3/22/21. Mailed notice (lp, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: This matter has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez for ruling on final disposition of this case. The Parties are directed to review the LR 16.4 Scheduling in Social Security Cases available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov and this Court's Standing Order in Social Security Cases. No further order will be entered regarding setting dates for a briefing schedule.Mailed notice (lp, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Maria Valdez, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/10/20. (aee, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the joint consent #7 , this case is transferred to the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. All deadlines set before Judge Blakey are stricken. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Nigel B Cooney as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 1/15/2021, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Should the parties elect to do so, they should notify Ms. Lewis, and the case will be reassigned upon receipt of the signed consent form. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that, due to a clerical error case 20cv6900, was assigned in error to the Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez, therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the assignment of 20cv6900 to Magistrate Judge Valdez be vacated as the assigned judge and the case shall be reassigned directly to the Honorable John Robert Blakey who was assigned the previously dismissed matter 17cv4775. Case reassigned to the Honorable John Robert Blakey for all further proceedings. Honorable Maria Valdez no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/25/20. (aee, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dustin Bryant by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dustin Bryant ; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17669547. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Maria Valdez. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (ke, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bryant v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
Represented By: | Nigel B Cooney |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dustin Bryant | |
Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.