20/20 Foresight, Inc. v. McGuffin
20/20 Foresight, Inc. and Janis McGuffin |
1:2020cv06915 |
November 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert W Gettleman |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPLY by Janis McGuffin to response in opposition to motion #11 (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE by 20/20 Foresight, Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Janis McGuffin to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Janis McGuffin #5 (Scolaro, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff 20/20 Foresight, Inc. by Lisa Marie Roccanova (Roccanova, Lisa) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff 20/20 Foresight, Inc. by Jeffrey James Scolaro (Scolaro, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Motion presentment hearing set for 12/8/2020 is stricken. Counsel is reminded to check the general court and this court's website pages prohibiting noticing motions for presentment until further notice. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: The court set the following briefing schedule on defendants' motion to dismiss #5 : plaintiff's response due 12/24/2020; defendants' reply due by 12/31/2020. The court will issue its ruling via CM/ECF. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Alexander Nicholas Loftus for presentment of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 12/8/2020 at 09:15 AM. (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Janis McGuffin to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Janis McGuffin (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 4 MAILED notice of removal letter to counsel of record. (nsf, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Janis McGuffin by Alexander Nicholas Loftus (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, case number (2020L010925) filed by Janis McGuffin Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17671393. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Loftus, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: 20/20 Foresight, Inc. v. McGuffin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: 20/20 Foresight, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey James Scolaro |
Represented By: | Lisa Marie Roccanova |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janis McGuffin | |
Represented By: | Alexander Nicholas Loftus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.