Schermerhorn v. Saul
Plaintiff: Lisa M Schermerhorn
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv07062
Filed: November 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jorge L Alonso
Referring Judge: M David Weisman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to file electronic certified administrative record and answer to plaintiff's complaint #10 is granted up to and including 3/30/21. Mailed notice (ao,)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Lindland, Kurt)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Weisman. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. Parties shall follow the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Mailed notice (ao,)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable M. David Weisman for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable Jorge L. Alonso no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/7/21.(gcy, )
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. This case will be sent to the executive committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court are stricken. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Lindland, Kurt)
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Kurt N. Lindland as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Saul (Lindland, Kurt)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Good, Neil)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lisa M Schermerhorn by Neil H. Good (Good, Neil)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Lisa M Schermerhorn for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Good, Neil)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lisa M Schermerhorn; (Good, Neil)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schermerhorn v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa M Schermerhorn
Represented By: Neil H. Good
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Represented By: Kurt N. Lindland
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?