Yu v. Punmit Inc.
| JANET YU |
| PUNMIT INC., dba OPART THAI HOUSE and Punmit Inc. doing business as Opart Thai House |
| 1:2020cv07124 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Janet Yu of proof of service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Servie)(Gray, Marcus) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Janet Yu to withdraw motion to appear pro hac vice #3 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Doogan, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17796678. (DeRose, Robert) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17726701. (Doogan, Jessica) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Punmit Inc. (mp, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff JANET YU by Marcus J Gray (Gray, Marcus) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by JANET YU; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17700107. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Gray, Marcus) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
