Mitchell v. Saul
Plaintiff: Samuel Lee Mitchell
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv07133
Filed: December 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Young B Kim
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2020 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The government is directed to file the administrative record by February 12, 2021. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by April 12, 2021. The government's response and/or cross- motion for summary judgment is due by June 14, 2021. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, he may file a reply brief by June 28, 2021, but one is not required. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. Mailed notice (ma,)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim pursuant to LocalRule 73.1 for all further proceedings, parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/10/2020.(jh, )
December 10, 2020 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the joint consent #8 , this case is transferred to the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Any deadlines before Judge Blakey are stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 9, 2020 Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Parsons, Lisa)
December 8, 2020 Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Saul (Heffron, Scott)
December 4, 2020 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 1/18/2021, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Additionally, the parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Should the parties elect to do so, they should notify Ms. Lewis, and the case will be reassigned upon receipt of the signed consent form. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 3, 2020 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Samuel Lee Mitchell by Thomas D. Yates (Yates, Thomas)
December 3, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mp, )
December 2, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Samuel Lee Mitchell for leave to file In forma Pauperis (Parsons, Lisa)
December 2, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Samuel Lee Mitchell by Lisa Beth Parsons (Parsons, Lisa)
December 2, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Parsons, Lisa)
December 2, 2020 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copies by Samuel Lee Mitchell (Parsons, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Lee Mitchell
Represented By: Lisa Beth Parsons
Represented By: Thomas D. Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Represented By: Scott Dennis Heffron
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?