Hebert v. Saul
Michael C Hebert |
Andrew M Saul |
1:2020cv07201 |
December 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Susan E Cox |
Martha M Pacold |
Social Security: Black Lung |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #8 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 4/5/2021 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 6/4/2021. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 7/19/2021. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 8/2/2021. Mailed notice (np, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Heffron, Scott) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been reassigned to Judge Cox. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 2/2/2021 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 4/5/2021. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 5/20/2021. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 6/3/2021. Mailed notice (np, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Susan E. Cox pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Martha M. Pacold no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 12/11/2020. (bg, ) |
Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Brown, James) |
Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M Saul (Heffron, Scott) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael C Hebert by James P. Brown (Brown, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael C Hebert; (Brown, James) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hebert v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael C Hebert | |
Represented By: | James P. Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
Represented By: | Scott Dennis Heffron |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.