Walker v. City of Chicago et al
| Xavier Walker |
| Anthony Brzeniak, Stanley Sanders, John Cruz, Thomas Mahoney, Donald Wolverton, City of Chicago, John Riordan, Cook County, Michael Pietryla, Robert Bartik, David Wright and Brian Holy |
| 1:2020cv07209 |
| December 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Ronald A Guzman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: In lieu of an initial status hearing, the Court directs the parties to, within 10 days of this order, confer to discuss the nature and bases of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. The parties shall also discuss deadlines for Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures and a proposed discovery plan. A written initial status report and proposed discovery plan shall be filed within 7 days of conferring as provided herein. Plaintiff is responsible for initiating such a meeting, and all lead counsel for all parties are required to participate. Failure or refusal to participate in such a meeting or to cooperate in the preparation of the written report may constitute a basis for sanctions. The Court will thereafter issue an order setting a discovery schedule. Mailed notice. (kp, )
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Defendant City of Chicago's motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. The City shall answer or otherwise plead no later than March 2, 2021. Mailed notice (mjc, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time Defendant City of Chicago's Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading (Wallace, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Christopher A Wallace (Wallace, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xavier Walker as to City of Chicago on 12/31/2020, answer due 1/21/2021. (Samuels, Jeanette)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xavier Walker as to Robert Bartik on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; John Cruz on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; Brian Holy on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; Michael Pietryla on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; John Riordan on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; Stanley Sanders on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; Donald Wolverton on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021; David Wright on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. (Samuels, Jeanette)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Robert Bartik, Anthony Brzeniak, City of Chicago, Cook County, John Cruz, Brian Holy, Thomas Mahoney, Michael Pietryla, John Riordan, Stanley Sanders, Donald Wolverton, David Wright (jg, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Xavier Walker by Jeanette Samuels (Samuels, Jeanette)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mxo, )
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET for Plaintiff Xavier Walker by Jeanette Samuels (Samuels, Jeanette) ( Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 12/7/2020) (ec, ).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Xavier Walker; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17711351. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Samuels, Jeanette)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
