Hernandez v. Vibe Credit Union et al
| Gloria Hernandez |
| Vibe Credit Union, Equifax Information Services LLC, Oakland County Credit Union and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv07215 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal #9 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), all claims against Defendant Vibe Credit Union f/k/a Oakland County Credit Union is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 9 Voluntary Dismissal; VIBE Credit Union by Gloria Hernandez (Slaughter, Kathryn) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC's agreed motion for an extension of time to file responsive pleading #6 is granted. Equifax Information Services, LLC's responsive pleading due on or before 2/19/2021. The parties joint initial status report due on 2/22/2021 is stricken and reset to 3/1/2021. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC by Claire Brennan (Brennan, Claire) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (First Unopposed Request) (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services LLC (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and Vibe Credit Union. (lxk, ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 2/22/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Slaughter, Kathryn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gloria Hernandez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17712823. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Payment, #2 Exhibit Credit Report, #3 Exhibit Letter, #4 Exhibit Credit Report)(Slaughter, Kathryn) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (as, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
