Jones v. Winters et al
| Sam Jones |
| R Winters, Schrader, J Johnson and Love |
| 1:2020cv07409 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 remains under review. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must file an "IFP Statement" explaining why he believes he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis despite spending funds that he could have used to pay the filing fee. If necessary, Plaintiff may file his IFP Statement under seal by writing "File Under Seal with Permission of the Court" on the top. If Plaintiff does not comply by January 29, 2021, this case will be summarily dismissed. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/21/2020. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Sam Jones for attorney representation. (Envelope postmarked 12/7/2020) (ec, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Sam Jones for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 12/7/2020) (ec, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (ec, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Sam Jones. (Envelope postmarked 12/7/2020) (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
