Fiastru v. Prim et al
| Ciprian Fiastru |
| Bill Prim, William P. Barr, Robert Guadian, Chad F. Wolf and William Barr |
| 1:2020cv07589 |
| December 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #5 is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ewf, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Ciprian Fiastru to withdraw (Ibrahim, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Ciprian Fiastru for rule to show cause (Ibrahim, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Barr, Robert Guadian, Bill Prim, Chad F. Wolf (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Barr, Robert Guadian, Bill Prim, Chad F. Wolf (Oswald, Craig) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Ciprian Fiastru against All Defendants Filing fee $ 5, receipt number 0752-17761805. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ibrahim, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
