Ammons v. CCDOC Staff et al
| Keymon Ammons |
| Division 9 Superintendant, Sanchez, Toni Preckwinkle, CCDOC Staff, Tom Dart, Brown and CCDOC Director |
| 1:2020cv07619 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Cook County Jail pretrial detainee Keymon Ammons initiated this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 by submitting a complaint #1 and motion for attorney representation #3 . He has neither prepaid the full $402 filing fee nor sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (in other words, permission to pay the filing fee in installments). Plaintiff must prepay the $402 filing fee or submit a properly supported application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis using the Court's form. If he fails to comply by 3/16/2021, this case will be summarily dismissed. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order, an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and filing instructions. Signed by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 2/16/2021. Mailed notice (lma, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Keymon Ammons for attorney representation (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and zero copies by Keymon Ammons (Envelope postmarked 12/14/2020) (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
