Del Toro v. Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC
| Noelle Del Toro |
| Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC |
| 1:2020cv07627 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice and each party shall bear their own costs and fees pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #11 filed by Plaintiff on 2/18/2021. (rao, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Noelle Del Toro Without Prejudice (Klinger, Gary) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (mc, ) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC by Thomas E. Ahlering (Ahlering, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #8 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 3/8/2021. (rao, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or otherwise plead (UNOPPOSED) (Cockroft, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC by Andrew Randall Cockroft (Cockroft, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Noelle Del Toro as to Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC on 1/5/2021, answer due 1/26/2021. (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 3/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC (exr, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Noelle Del Toro by Gary Edward Mason (Mason, Gary) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Noelle Del Toro by Gary Michael Klinger (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Noelle Del Toro; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17766322.(Klinger, Gary) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Del Toro v. Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ace Hotel Chicago, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Randall Cockroft |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Ahlering |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Noelle Del Toro | |
| Represented By: | Gary Michael Klinger |
| Represented By: | Gary Edward Mason |
| Represented By: | Gary M. Klinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
