Smith v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
Cynthia Smith |
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Astrazeneca LP, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc, Novartis Institues for Biomedical Research, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) IP LLC, Novartis Consumer Health, Inc., Procter & Gamble Company, The, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Pfizer, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., F/K/A Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. |
1:2020cv07670 |
December 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TRANSFERRED to the District of New Jersey, Newark Division, the electronic record. (aee, ) |
ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:21-cv-00448, filed 01/08/2021. (bg, ) |
Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to District of New Jersey, Newark Division. (aee, ) |
Civil Case Terminated pursuant to MDL (2789) Conditional Transfer Order filed 01/06/2021. (aee, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 3/8/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d), the removing party's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. The removing party should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the opposing party has been given notice of removal. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Joint Status Report) (axc). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (exr, ) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) IP LLC, Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. (Carwinski, Timothy) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) IP LLC, Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. by Timothy Robert Carwinski (Carwinski, Timothy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Carwinski, Timothy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019 L 006067) filed by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) IP LLC, Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17771845. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1, #2 Exhibit A2, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Carwinski, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.