Arora v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Ashok Arora |
| John Does 1-50 and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv07679 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff has filed a complaint (Dkt. 1) but has not paid the required filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Plaintiff is directed to either file an IFP application or pay the full filing fee on or before 3/19/21. Failure to comply with this order by that date may result in summary dismissal of this case. Information for people without lawyers can be found on this court website: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Pages.aspx?/2+UWDbtVzCDq3Lu8BusuQ== Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland for all further proceedings. Honorable Joan H. Lefkow no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/28/2020. (mc, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Ashok Arora (rp, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (rp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Ashok Arora (rp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
