Dodgen v. AARP
| Laurinda Dodgen |
| AARP |
| 1:2021cv00086 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Joint Initial Status Report, filed by Defendant AARP. (Prince-Loyd, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17979146. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Court Admissions Attachment)(Prince-Loyd, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant AARP by Richard Patrick McArdle (McArdle, Richard)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status conference set for 3/9/2021 at 9:15 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (dal, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ke, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laurinda Dodgen by Keenan J. Saulter (Saulter, Keenan)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Saulter, Keenan)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Employment Discrimination filed by Laurinda Dodgen; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17804389.(Saulter, Keenan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dodgen v. AARP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laurinda Dodgen | |
| Represented By: | Keenan J. Saulter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AARP | |
| Represented By: | Melanie Ann Prince-Loyd |
| Represented By: | Richard Patrick McArdle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
