Whatley v. Chicago police auto pound; city of, department of police 3510 south michigan ave, chicago, Ill 60653 et al
| Lamar Whatley |
| Turnok, John Burke, Hazel crest police department ill,l 60429, Auto pound location, Chicago police auto pound; city of, department of police 3510 south michigan ave, chicago, Ill 60653, 10301 south doty ave, chicago ill, 60617 and Cotton |
| 1:2021cv00134 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's second application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $30.83 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration and to this Court's fiscal department. However, summonses shall not issue. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. By April 12, 2021, Plaintiff must submit an amended complaint on the Court's required form, or the Court will dismiss Plaintiff's lawsuit with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of- address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action may be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an amended civil rights complaint form and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 3/8/2021.Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs / financial affidavit (prisoner cases) by Plaintiff Lamar Whatley. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 2/5/2021) (ph, ) |
| MAILED Plaintiff an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of order #5 dated 1/25/2021. (ph, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's unsigned request seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied as incomplete. By February 26, 2021, Plaintiff must either: (1) submit a completed in forma pauperis application that complies with the below instructions; or (2) pre-pay the full $402.00 filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to comply with the foregoing instructions by that date, this case will be summarily dismissed. Plaintiff's "motion to summon of notice" #4 is denied. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 1/25/2021. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Lamar Whatley to summon of notice. (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION to proceed in this case and declare that I am unable to pay the cost in District Court without prepaying cost of these proceedings and that I am entitled to relief request by Plaintiff Lamar Whatley. (Exhibits) (ph, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Lamar Whatley. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 (Envelope postmarked 12/31/2020)) (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
