Walker v. The Travlers Illinois Syndicate Inc. et al
Iesha N Walker |
Donald L Cole and The Travlers Illinois Syndicate Inc. |
1:2021cv00218 |
January 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jorge L Alonso |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILED Order dated 01/29/2021 to Iesha N Walker. (rc, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Plaintiff Iesha Walker, pro se, seeks permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this suit. Because plaintiff does not have sufficient assets to pay the filing fee, her in forma pauperis application #3 is granted. However, plaintiff's allegations are not sufficient to survive this Court's initial screening, and the complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by 3/5/2021. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/29/2021: Mailed notice (rc, ) |
Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Iesha N Walker. (rc, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Iesha N Walker for attorney representation. (rc, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Iesha N Walker for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (rc, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (rc, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Iesha N Walker. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.