Scarborough, Jr. v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kevin E. Scarborough, Jr.
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv00470
Filed: January 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Referring Judge: Susan E Cox
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Susan E. Cox pursuant to Local Rule 73.1 C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/24/21. (nsf, )
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Unopposed motion for extension of time to 5/28/21 to file the Certified Administrative Record and Answer to plaintiff's complaint #7 is granted. Mailed notice(maf)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Haile, Jonathan)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Schultz, Barry)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Jonathan C. Haile as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Haile, Jonathan)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber for all further proceedings pursuant to 28:294(b). Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 2/4/2021. (rp, )
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kevin E. Scarborough, Jr. by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kevin E. Scarborough, Jr.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17870101. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jmk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scarborough, Jr. v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Jonathan C. Haile
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin E. Scarborough, Jr.
Represented By: Barry Alan Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?