Rojas Hernandez v. TransUnion LLC
Plaintiff: Arturo Rojas Hernandez
Defendant: Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. and TransUnion LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv00654
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Marvin E Aspen
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 Filing 11 WITHDRAWING Daniel O. Halvorsen as counsel for Defendant TransUnion LLC and substituting Laura K. Rang as counsel of record (Rang, Laura)
February 26, 2021 Filing 10 Trans Union, LLC's ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by TransUnion LLC(Brady, Scott)
February 18, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal #8 , defendant Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. is dismissed with prejudice and terminated from the case. Mailed notice (ags)
February 17, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Arturo Rojas Hernandez (Davidson, Joseph)
February 17, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion LLC by Daniel Owen Halvorsen (Halvorsen, Daniel)
February 17, 2021 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion LLC by Scott Edwin Brady (Brady, Scott)
February 12, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arturo Rojas Hernandez as to TransUnion LLC on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021. (Davidson, Joseph)
February 12, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arturo Rojas Hernandez as to Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. on 2/10/2021, answer due 3/3/2021. (Davidson, Joseph)
February 5, 2021 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen: Initial status hearing is set for 4/29/2021 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (ags)
February 5, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Resurgent Capital Services, L.P., TransUnion LLC (jmk, )
February 4, 2021 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arturo Rojas Hernandez by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph)
February 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arturo Rojas Hernandez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17897846. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph)
February 4, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rojas Hernandez v. TransUnion LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arturo Rojas Hernandez
Represented By: Joseph Scott Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TransUnion LLC
Represented By: Scott Edwin Brady
Represented By: Daniel Owen Halvorsen
Represented By: Laura K. Rang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?