Krajisnik v. C.D. Peacock, Inc. et al
| Suzana Krajisnik |
| Robert Baumgardner, Dyol Hill, Christopher Croteau, Seymour Holtzman, C.D. Peacock, Inc. and Yingxue Duan |
| 1:2021cv00775 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1962 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 MEMORANDUM by C.D. Peacock, Inc. in Opposition to motion for reconsideration #28 DEFENDANT C.D. PEACOCK, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 36 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik by Richard Keith Hellerman (Hellerman, Richard) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Yingxue Duan. (lxk, ) |
| Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The Court's 3/18/21 minute order is amended to state that Defendants' motion for an extension #31 is granted. Defendants' response to Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #28 is due by 4/7/21. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due by 4/14/21. The Rule 16 initial status conference and hearing on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is reset from 4/5/21 to 5/6/21 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Robert Baumgardner. (lxk, ) |
| Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc., filed a motion #31 asking for 2 additional weeks to respond to Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff's counsel says she tried to "compromise" by offering a two-day extension. #32 But, given that Plaintiff originally noticed its motion for reconsideration for presentation on 4/5/21, Plaintiff's counsel's stated belief that "it is in her best interest to preserve the possibility of a ruling on the Motion for Reconsideration prior to the hearing in the State court case" (which is 4/2/21) seems disingenuous, at best. The Court expects more from the attorneys who practice in the Northern District of Illinois. The Court recognizes that the parties have starkly different views of the facts and legal issues in this case. But the attorneys can zealously represent the interests of their respective clients, while simultaneously extending to one another some basic degree of professional courtesy. And, certainly, it is not an efficient use of this Court's resources to decide an disagreement about such a minor, nonsubstantive issue as a reasonable request for a 2 week extension. It is the hope of the Court that it will not have to resolve a dispute of this nature again. Plaintiff's motion #31 is granted. Mailed notice (np, ) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE by Suzana Krajisnik re response in opposition to motion, #32 (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 32 RESPONSE by Suzana Krajisnikin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik for reconsideration #28 , MOTION by Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for reconsideration #28 DEFENDANT C.D. PEACOCK, INC.'S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR #31 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 31 MOTION by Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for reconsideration #28 DEFENDANT C.D. PEACOCK, INC.'S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 30 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #28 is due by 3/24/21. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due by 3/30/21. (ca, ) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew Galper Fullett for presentment of motion for reconsideration #28 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 4/6/2021 at 09:00 AM. (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 28 MOTION by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik for reconsideration (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 27 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Christopher Croteau, Dyol Hill, Seymour Holtzman by Audrey Olson Gardner (Gardner, Audrey) |
| Filing 26 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Christopher Croteau, Dyol Hill, Seymour Holtzman by Jane M. McFetridge (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 25 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Suzana Krajisnik. Dyol Hill waiver sent on 3/2/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 24 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Suzana Krajisnik. C.D. Peacock, Inc. waiver sent on 3/2/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 23 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Suzana Krajisnik. Seymour Holtzman waiver sent on 3/2/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Suzana Krajisnik. Christopher Croteau waiver sent on 3/2/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik by Andrew Galper Fullett (Fullett, Andrew) |
| Filing 20 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit R (refiled as redacted, formerly Exhibit S) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 19 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit K (refiled as redacted) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendant's unopposed motion #17 to seal exhibits K, ECF No. [9-7], and R, ECF No. [9-13], to Plaintiff's complaint is granted. Plaintiff is directed to file amended exhibits K and R with the confidential information redacted by 3/1/21. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 17 MOTION by Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc. to seal DEFENDANT C.D. PEACOCK'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBITS K AND R TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (McFetridge, Jane) |
|
Filing 16
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 2/12/21 before the Honorable John Z. Lee. Order Number: 40158. Court Reporter Contact Information: Joseph Rickhoff, 312-435-5562, joseph_rickhoff@ilnd.uscourts.gov. |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 4/5/21 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 3/30/21. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 14 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit O (sealed) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 13 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit J (sealed) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 12 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit C (sealed) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 11 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit B (sealed) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 10 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik Exhibit A (sealed) regarding amended complaint,, #9 (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 9 Complaint at Law (filed as ordered redacted) AMENDED complaint by Suzana Krajisnik against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit D, #2 Exhibit Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit Exhibit F, #4 Exhibit Exhibit G, #5 Exhibit Exhibit H, #6 Exhibit Exhibit I, #7 Exhibit Exhibit K, #8 Exhibit Exhibit L, #9 Exhibit Exhibit M (redacted), #10 Exhibit Exhibit N, #11 Exhibit Exhibit P, #12 Exhibit Exhibit Q, #13 Exhibit Exhibit R (formerly filed as Ex. S))(Barack, Max) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Motion hearing held on 2/12/21. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant's emergency motion to seal #6 is granted as to paragraphs 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 58, 61, 62, 63, 87, 93, 106, 121, 161, 178, 179, and Exhibits A, B, C, J, M (to the extent it contains the identifying email address), and O. The motion is denied in all other respects. Plaintiff should file another copy of the complaint and exhibits with these portions redacted by 2/15/21. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendant's emergency motion to seal the complaint is set for 2/12/21 at 1:00 p.m. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc. to seal document complaint,, #1 (EMERGENCY) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc. by Audrey Olson Gardner (Gardner, Audrey) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant C.D. Peacock, Inc. by Jane M. McFetridge (McFetridge, Jane) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik by Haskell Sidney Garfinkel (Garfinkel, Haskell) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Suzana Krajisnik by Max Phillip Barack (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 1 SEALED COMPLAINT filed by Suzana Krajisnik; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17919795. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit Exhibit R, #19 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Barack, Max) Modified on 2/12/2021 (sm, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
