BAGLEY v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
| ANDREA BAGLEY |
| Johnson & Johnson Inc. and ETHICON INC. |
| 1:2021cv00812 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff has established for pleading purposes that there is complete diversity (Dkt. 7), and complied with this Court's order (Dkt. 3) requiring a jurisdictional supplement as to subject matter jurisdiction. Joint initial status report remains due 5/13/21. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to of Jurisdiction (Fredona, Rebecca) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 5/13/21, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by ANDREA BAGLEY. ETHICON INC. waiver sent on 2/12/2021, answer due 4/13/2021. (Fredona, Rebecca) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by ANDREA BAGLEY. Johnson & Johnson Inc. waiver sent on 2/21/2021, answer due 4/22/2021. (Fredona, Rebecca) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: In light of Plaintiff's invocation of diversity jurisdiction as the basis for federal jurisdiction, on or before 3/9/2021, Plaintiff shall file a jurisdictional supplement, as a separate docket entry. Plaintiff is reminded that allegations of residence, as opposed to citizenship, are not sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. Slottke v. Wis. Dep't of Workforce Dev., 734 F. App'x 354, 355 (7th Cir. 2018). For individuals, "[c]itizenship means domicile (the person's long-term plan for a state of habitation) rather than just current residence." Myrick v. WellPoint, Inc., 764 F.3d 662, 664 (7th Cir. 2014). Plaintiff has alleged her own residence but not her citizenship. A corporation "is a citizen of two states (though they may coincide): the state in which the corporation is incorporated and the state in which its principal place of business is located." Pastor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 487 F.3d 1042, 1047 (7th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff has alleged the states in which Defendants maintain their principal places of business, but not the states in which they are incorporated. If Plaintiff fails to file the jurisdictional supplement as directed, the case may be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ANDREA BAGLEY by Rebecca Laine Fredona (Fredona, Rebecca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by ANDREA BAGLEY; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17926257. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fredona, Rebecca) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
