Chong v. Leadcrunch, Inc.
| Ukyong Chong |
| Leadcrunch, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00931 |
| February 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff intends to file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 5/7/21. Upon the filing of the amended complaint, defendant's motion to dismiss #11 will be terminated as moot. Defendant's response to the amended complaint is due 5/28/21 and the parties' initial status report is now due 5/28/21. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Leadcrunch, Inc. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Felton, Thadford) |
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Leadcrunch, Inc. (Felton, Thadford) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Leadcrunch, Inc. by Courtney A Adair (Adair, Courtney) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Leadcrunch, Inc. by Thadford A. Felton (Felton, Thadford) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ukyong Chong. Leadcrunch, Inc. waiver sent on 2/24/2021, answer due 4/26/2021. (Gorman, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 4/23/21, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ukyong Chong by Andrew H. Haber (Haber, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ukyong Chong by Dennis Ray Favaro (Favaro, Dennis) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gorman, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ukyong Chong by Patrick John Gorman (Gorman, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ukyong Chong; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17945623.(Gorman, Patrick) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chong v. Leadcrunch, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Leadcrunch, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Thadford A. Felton |
| Represented By: | Courtney A Adair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ukyong Chong | |
| Represented By: | Patrick John Gorman |
| Represented By: | Andrew H. Haber |
| Represented By: | Dennis Ray Favaro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
