Soto v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
| MARGARITO SOTO, JR. and Margarito Soto, Jr |
| TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and Takeda pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00996 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Case called for telephone conference on 4/20/2021 and Plaintiff nor counsel for Plaintiff appeared or filed a status report by 4/13/2021. Telephone Conference reset for 4/27/2021 at 9:30 AM. Failure to appear on 4/27/2021 will result in dismissal of this action for want of prosecution. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (866) 434-5269, Access Code: 8087837. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial telephonic status conference in this matter is set for 4/20/2021 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 4/13/2021. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (866) 434-5269 and the access code is 8087837. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (rj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by MARGARITO SOTO, JR; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17953749. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Mccarley, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
