Ostap et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Jerry A Ostap and Nadine Ostap
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2021cv01078
Filed: February 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Franklin U Valderrama
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2021 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On Stipulation 42 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The joint status report due 4/26/2021 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (axc).
March 10, 2021 Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) (Elster, Jason)
March 10, 2021 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated by Jason B. Elster (Elster, Jason)
March 2, 2021 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jerry A Ostap by Jonathan Matthew Thomas (Thomas, Jonathan)
March 2, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jerry A Ostap by Joseph A. Power, Jr (Power, Joseph)
February 25, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTE Entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court directs the parties to file their appearances on or before 03/29/2021, and to file a joint status report addressing the need for and the status of any case-specific fact discovery and case-specific expert discovery on or before 04/26/2021. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Joint Status Report) (axc.)
February 24, 2021 Filing 8 MAILED Rule 83.15 Letter to all counsel of record (bg, )
February 24, 2021 Filing 7 RECEIVED from Arizona; Case Number 2:16-cv-02342 (bg)
February 23, 2021 Remark: Transferring Case to the Northern District of Illinois via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/11/2021. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 *AMENDED By Doc. #6 *SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/9/2021. (MAP) *Modified on 2/17/2021 (MAP). [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 49 - The dismissal orders in the cases listed on Attachment A are vacated. The Clerk is directed to reinstate each case in this MDL. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/1/2021. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 *VACATED By Doc. #4 *ORDER granting Stipulation (doc. 21041 in Lead MDL-15-2641) of Dismissal Without Prejudice. The claims of the Plaintiffs are dismissed in their entirety without prejudice to the re-filing of same, and the parties are to bear their own costs. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 1/13/20. (MAP) *Modified on 2/8/2021 (MAP). [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]
July 14, 2016 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell, with member case number: CV-16-2342-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LSP) [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]
July 14, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-13175987 filed by Jerry A Ostap, Nadine Ostap. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LSP) [Transferred from Arizona on 2/24/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ostap et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated
Represented By: Richard B. North, Jr.
Represented By: Jason B. Elster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Represented By: Richard B. North, Jr.
Represented By: Jason B. Elster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry A Ostap
Represented By: Joseph R Johnson
Represented By: Joseph A. Power, Jr.
Represented By: Jonathan Matthew Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nadine Ostap
Represented By: Joseph R Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?