Salazar v. Kelly et al
| Ignacio Brian Salazar |
| Kelly, Rios, County Of Will and Dale Santarelli |
| 1:2021cv01086 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $3.67 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration and to the Court's Fiscal Department. Summons shall not issue at this time. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a federal claim. Failure to submit a proposed amended complaint by May 18, 2021, will result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a Court order and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 4/13/2021: Mailed notice (rc, )
|
| E-MAILED Order dated 04/13/2021 to the Fiscal Department. (rc, ) |
| MAILED Order dated 04/13/2021 to Will County Adult Detention Facility - Trust Fund Officer. (rc, ) |
| MAILED blank Amended Complaint Form, and Order dated 04/13/2021 to Ignacio Brian Salazar. (rc, ) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of service. (Envelope postmarked 03/10/2021) (rc, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Ignacio Brian Salazar for attorney representation. (Envelope postmarked 03/10/2021) (rc, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ignacio Brian Salazar for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 03/10/2021) (rc, ) |
| MAILED Plaintiff order #3 and a blank ifp form. (mc, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit without pre-paying the $402.00 filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff want to pursue this lawsuit, he must, by March 29, 2021, either (1) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) seek leave to pay the filing fee in installments by submitting a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to do so will result in summary dismissal of this case for failure to pay the fee. The Clerk is directed to (1) change Plaintiff's booking number to the number in the caption of this order; and (2) send Plaintiff a blank application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner version), along with a copy of this order. The Court defers screening of Plaintiff's complaint #1 until his filing-fee status is resolved. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 3/1/2021. Mailed notice(mc, )
|
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (mc, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Ignacio Brian Salazar (Exhibit) (Envelope postmarked 2/23/2021). (mc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
