Chandler v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Ellen Chandler |
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. |
1:2021cv01222 |
March 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Joan H Lefkow |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Motion to withdraw as attorney #11 is granted. Attorney Richard B. North, Jr. is terminated as counsel for defendant. Motion to stay #12 is granted. Mailed notice (ags) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C R Bard Inc to stay /Supporting Memorandum (Joint) (Elster, Jason) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Attorney Mr. North to withdraw as attorney for Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C R Bard Inc. No party information provided (Elster, Jason) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C R Bard Inc by Kelyn J Smith (Smith, Kelyn) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C R Bard Inc by Michael Baier (Baier, Michael) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C R Bard Inc by Jason B. Elster (Elster, Jason) |
Filing 7 MAILED transfer in rule 83.15 letter to counsel of record (nsf, ) |
Filing 6 RECEIVED from Illinois Central; Case Number 1:21-cv-01069 (nsf,) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's #1 Complaint for damages which is a part of a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving personal injury cases against Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. The Plaintiff received implants from the Defendants in Rockford, Illinois, and claim they are defective. Due to neither Defendant residing in the Central District of Illinois and a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurring in Rockford, Illinois, the Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer Plaintiff's case to the Northern District of Illinois. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 2/25/21. (TK) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:17-cv-02602. . [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Remark: Transferring Case to the Central District of Illinois via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Filing 4 AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/11/2021. (MAP) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Filing 3 *AMENDED By Doc. #4 *SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/9/2021. (MAP) *Modified on 2/17/2021 (MAP). [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell, with member case number: CV-17-02602-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LSP) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-14507821 filed by Ellen Chandler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LSP) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/4/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.