Nagle v. Nagle et al
Plaintiff: Dan Nagle
Defendant: Slobodan Pavolic and James P Nagle
Case Number: 1:2021cv01262
Filed: March 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Slobodan Pavolic for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead (Steck, Richard)
May 3, 2021 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Slobodan Pavolic by Richard Eric Steck (Steck, Richard)
April 23, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James P Nagle by Thomas Michael Breen (Breen, Thomas)
April 22, 2021 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Defendant Nagle's motion for an extension of time #8 is granted. His answer or other responsive pleading is now due 5/19/2021. Mailed notice (air, )
April 21, 2021 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James P Nagle by Steven H. Fine (Fine, Steven)
April 21, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant James P Nagle for extension of time to file responsive pleading (unopposed) (Stefaneas, Telly)
April 21, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James P Nagle by Telly Stefaneas (Stefaneas, Telly)
April 15, 2021 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Dan Nagle regarding Affidavit of Service of Summons and Verified Complaint served on Slobodan Pavolic on April 15, 2021 (Gowen, Nicholas)
March 17, 2021 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Dan Nagle regarding Affidavit of Service served on James Nagle on March 16, 2021 (Gowen, Nicholas)
March 8, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants James P Nagle, Slobodan Pavolic (kl, )
March 5, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dan Nagle by Geneva Claflin Ramirez (Ramirez, Geneva)
March 5, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dan Nagle by Nicholas A Gowen (Gowen, Nicholas)
March 5, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gowen, Nicholas)
March 5, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified filed by Dan Nagle; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17993756.(Gowen, Nicholas)
March 5, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nagle v. Nagle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dan Nagle
Represented By: Nicholas A Gowen
Represented By: Geneva Claflin Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Slobodan Pavolic
Represented By: Richard Eric Steck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James P Nagle
Represented By: Steven H. Fine
Represented By: Telly Stefaneas
Represented By: Thomas Michael Breen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?