Branick v. Roku, Inc.
| Starlinda Branick |
| Roku, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01271 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint and to continue date by which the parties must file their joint written status report #10 is granted. Date for answer is continued to 5/31/2021. Date for report of parties' planning meeting set to 6/10/2021. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Roku, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 , MOTION by Defendant Roku, Inc. to continue (Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and to Continue Date by Which the Parties Must File Their Joint Written Status Report) (Carter, Julius) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to respond to complaint #8 is granted to and including 4/30/2021. Parties are directed to submit a report of planning meeting by 5/10/2021. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Roku, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Carter, Julius) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Roku, Inc. by Julius Carter (Carter, Julius) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Starlinda Branick as to Roku, Inc. on 3/9/2021, answer due 3/30/2021. (Carlson, R. Bruce) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Parties are directed to file a joint written status report by 5/10/2021. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Roku, Inc. (crl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mxo, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Starlinda Branick by R. Bruce Carlson (Carlson, R. Bruce) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Starlinda Branick by Kyle Alan Shamberg (Shamberg, Kyle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Shamberg, Kyle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Starlinda Branick; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17995418.(Shamberg, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Branick v. Roku, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roku, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Julius Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Starlinda Branick | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Alan Shamberg |
| Represented By: | R. Bruce Carlson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
