Gallagher v. Costco Wholesale Corp. et al
Kathleen Gallagher |
Costco Wholesale Corp. and Lifetime Products, Inc. |
Whiteside & Goldberg, Ltd. |
1:2021cv01308 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION by Movant Whiteside & Goldberg, Ltd. to substitute attorney (O'Connor, Bryan) |
Filing 10 MINUTE Entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's submission. While Plaintiff filed this as a motion, it is only a consent order, and the Court denies Plaintiff's "motion" #5 without prejudice. Because Plaintiff's current counsel and Plaintiff's purported new counsel are from different firms, Plaintiff must first obtain leave of the Court via motion. See Local Rule 83.17 ("The attorney of record may not withdraw, nor may any other attorney file an appearance on behalf of the same party or as a substitute for the attorney of record, without first obtaining leave of court, except that substitutions or additions may be made without motion where both counsel are of the same firm.") Mailed notice (axc). |
Filing 9 JURY Demand (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing, #2 Notice of Service)(Fulco, Stacy) |
Filing 8 Defendant's Answer To Plaintiff's Complaint, Affirmative Defense And Counterclaim For Contribution Against Defendant Lifetime Products Inc., by Costco Wholesale Corp. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Fulco, Stacy) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Costco Wholesale Corp. by Chad Baker (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Baker, Chad) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Costco Wholesale Corp. by Stacy D. Fulco (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Fulco, Stacy) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Kathleen Gallagher to substitute attorney (Doherty, Brion) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 6/8/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Joint Status Report) (axc). |
Filing 3 Request to Waive Service of a Summons- Lifetime by Kathleen Gallagher (O'Connor, Bryan) |
Filing 2 Request to Waive Service of a Summons of Costco by Kathleen Gallagher (O'Connor, Bryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kathleen Gallagher; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18002805. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Connor, Bryan) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.