Cardona v. Bean et al
| Josu Cardona |
| Anthony Bean, Bean Professional Psychological Services, PLLC and Eric Eagle Hartmans |
| 1:2021cv01392 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Eric Eagle Hartmans. Eric Eagle Hartmans waiver sent on 3/12/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Barone, Anthony) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Josu Cardona. Bean Professional Psychological Services, PLLC waiver sent on 3/12/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Adler, David) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Josu Cardona. Anthony Bean waiver sent on 3/12/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Adler, David) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Josu Cardona by David M Adler (Adler, David) |
| Filing 3 MAILED Trademark Request Letter to Plaintiff's Counsel, David M. Adler. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Adler, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement filed by Josu Cardona; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18016113.(Adler, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
