Fechner v. Custom Culinary, Inc
Plaintiff: Dr. Kerry Fechner and Kerry Fechner
Defendant: Custom Culinary, INC an Illinois Corporation and Custom Culinary, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01404
Filed: March 12, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2021 Filing 14 STATUS Report SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT by Custom Culinary, Inc. (Kokontis, Megan)
May 4, 2021 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 12, the parties propose a discovery schedule. It might make sense, given the pendency of the dismissal motion (which targets the entire complaint), to stay discovery until a decision on the motion. The parties shall confer and set forth their respective positions in a supplemental status report on 05/10/2021. The tracking status hearing of 05/07/2021 is reset to 05/14/2021 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, )
April 28, 2021 Filing 12 STATUS Report JOINT by Kerry Fechner (Hollander, Eugene)
April 25, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the Defendant's motion #9 to dismiss, the Plaintiff's response is due by 05/20/2021. The defense reply is due by 06/03/2021. The tracking status hearing of 05/07/2021 remains as scheduled, but just to track the case and for the Court to review the 04/28/2021 joint initial status report. Emailed notice (mw, )
April 22, 2021 Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Custom Culinary, Inc. (Morrison, John)
April 22, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Custom Culinary, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint)(Morrison, John)
April 14, 2021 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Custom Culinary, Inc. by John Peirce Morrison (Morrison, John)
April 14, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Custom Culinary, Inc. by Megan M Kokontis (Kokontis, Megan)
April 7, 2021 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Kerry Fechner regarding Complaint and Summons served on Custom Culinary on 4/1/2021 (Hollander, Eugene)
March 24, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Custom Culinary, Inc. (cl, )
March 17, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 05/07/2021 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 04/28/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Attachment: #1 status report requirements)
March 15, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, )
March 12, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dr. Kerry Fechner by Paul W. Ryan (Ryan, Paul)
March 12, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dr. Kerry Fechner by Eugene K. Hollander (Hollander, Eugene)
March 12, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hollander, Eugene)
March 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dr. Kerry Fechner; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18017612.(Hollander, Eugene)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fechner v. Custom Culinary, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Custom Culinary, INC an Illinois Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Custom Culinary, Inc.
Represented By: John Peirce Morrison
Represented By: Megan M Kokontis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. Kerry Fechner
Represented By: Paul W. Ryan
Represented By: Eugene K. Hollander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerry Fechner
Represented By: Paul W. Ryan
Represented By: Eugene K. Hollander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?