Mosley v. Keedy et al
| Johnathan N Mosley |
| Commander Michael Rompa, Nicolas Keedy and Anthony De La Casa |
| 1:2021cv01501 |
| March 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED in forma pauperis application, along with order #3 dated 5/13/2021 to Plaintiff Johnathan N. Mosley. (gw, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff submitted a complaint but failed to either pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the Court grants him until June 10, 2021 to either file an in forma pauperis application on the enclosed form with the information required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) or pay the full $402 filing fee. The Court directs the Clerk to send Plaintiff an IFP application, along with a copy of this order. If Plaintiff fails to comply by the deadline, the Court will dismiss this case. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 5/13/2021. Mailed notice(gw, )
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Johnathan N Mosley. (aee, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/19/2021: #1 Envelope) (Envelope postmarked 3/16/21) (aee, ). Modified on 3/19/2021 (aee, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
