Molek v. Saul
Plaintiff: Maria Molek
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv01522
Filed: March 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Referring Judge: Young B Kim
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The government has until June 18, 2021, to file the administrative record. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by August 20, 2021. The government's response and/or cross- motion for summary judgment is due by October 22, 2021. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, she may file a reply brief by November 5, 2021, but one is not required. Mailed notice (ma,)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Young B. Kim for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Robert Blakey on 4/9/21.(gcy, )
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the joint consent #6 , this case is transferred to the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Mailed notice (gel, )
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Phillip, Danielle)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Danielle Anne Phillip as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Phillip, Danielle)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Maria Molek by Neil H. Good (Good, Neil)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Good, Neil)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Maria Molek for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Good, Neil)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Maria Molek; (Good, Neil)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (as, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Molek v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Molek
Represented By: Neil H. Good
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Danielle Anne Phillip
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?