Dabulskis v. Saul
Michelle Anne Dabulskis |
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
1:2021cv01561 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Raedy, Valerie) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michelle Anne Dabulskis (Fisher, Robert) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michelle Anne Dabulskis (Fisher, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michelle Anne Dabulskis as to Andrew M. Saul served on 3/25/2021, answer due 5/24/2021 (Fisher, Robert) |
Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Valerie Rebecca Raedy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Raedy, Valerie) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michelle Anne Dabulskis by Robert Emery Fisher (Fisher, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Fisher, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michelle Anne Dabulskis; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18043870.(Fisher, Robert) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (txl, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.