Doe v. Northwestern University
| Jane Doe |
| Northwestern University |
| 1:2021cv01579 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM by Jane Doe in Opposition to motion to dismiss #15 (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Motion for extension of time #19 is granted. Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss #15 is extended to be due by 6/14/2021; defendant's reply by 7/6/2021. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Plaintiff Jane Doe for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion to dismiss #15 , memorandum in support of motion #16 Agreed Motion (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jane Doe by Anthony Paronich (Paronich, Anthony) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss #15 is due by 5/17/2021; defendant's reply by 6/1/2021. The status hearing set for 5/4/2021 is stricken. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by Northwestern University in support of motion to dismiss #15 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Layden, David) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Northwestern University to dismiss Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Layden, David) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Motion to appear pro hac vice #13 is granted. Attorney Samuel J. Strauss is added as counsel for plaintiff. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18068858. (Strauss, Samuel) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jane Doe by Mary C. Turke (Turke, Mary) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Motion for extension of time #10 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 4/28/2021. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Northwestern University for extension of time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) (Layden, David) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 5/4/2021 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jane Doe by Jonathan Patrick Misny (Misny, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jane Doe by Brian Kevin Murphy (Murphy, Brian) |
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to Brian K. Murphy (daj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Northwestern University by Elena Marie Olivieri (Olivieri, Elena) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Northwestern University by Reid J Schar (Schar, Reid) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Northwestern University by David Charles Layden (Layden, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Layden, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from The Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2021-CH-00404) filed by Northwestern University Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18046015. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Layden, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
