Faulkner-Pride v. Saul
Plaintiff: Clorinda Faulkner-Pride
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv01648
Filed: March 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey Cummings
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Donohue, Megan)
April 2, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: This case has been reassigned to this Court. Defendant shall file the certified administrative record by 5/31/2021. Mailed notice (cc, )
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 3/31/2021. (jn, )
March 30, 2021 Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Bam, Maren)
March 30, 2021 Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Megan Elizabeth Donohue as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Donohue, Megan)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If the parties wish to consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge, a signed consent form should be filed promptly. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 3/29/2021. Mailed notice (jn, )
March 26, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, )
March 25, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Clorinda Faulkner-Pride by Maren Ann-miller Bam (Bam, Maren)
March 25, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Clorinda Faulkner-Pride for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Bam, Maren)
March 25, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bam, Maren)
March 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Clorinda Faulkner-Pride; (Bam, Maren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faulkner-Pride v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clorinda Faulkner-Pride
Represented By: Maren Ann-miller Bam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Donohue
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?